IHS
Mission & Goals: |
Groom
Skills,
Gather Evidence and
Generate Knowledge for people's health.
To Improve the
Efficacy,
Quality & Equity
of Health Systems. |
|
SDPH
Executive Summary ...
|
|
|
Policy
Recommendations
|
|
|
We feel time is ripe for the Central and State
governments India to pursue a proactive policy of fully
integrating the private health care institutions into the health
system. Based on our understanding of the state of private health
sector in India, with particular reference to Andhra Pradesh, and
review of literature on the subject, we have proposed in
Chapter-14 a set of policy recommendations. We reproduce the
operative parts of the recommendations below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
Develop and adopt a set of comprehensive policy
towards the private forprofit and nonprofit health care
institutions.
-
Ambulatory medical care is best provided
through a net work of family physicians (FP), who would usually be
self employed doctors but can include ambulatory care services by
other institutions as well. Steps to develop such a network will
include the following.
|
|
|
|
- Definition of the package of basic ambulatory care and
family physician services.
- A capitation fee based scheme of enrollment with FPs with
some provision to allow for annual review of choice of FPs
by the covered families.
- Public funding of FP service coverage at least for
families who can not afford to pay.
|
|
|
|
- In the short and medium term, private hospital and nursing
home capacity should be used to increase the incidence of
institutional deliveries in the country. Raising the incidence
of institutional deliveries vis a vis home deliveries would
help reduce maternal mortality rates. Public funding of
institutional deliveries by women from poor families, in
private HCIs will facilitate health sector reform by providing
incentives for private HCIs to adopt standards and assure
quality of maternity services, as well as build experience in
public financing and private provision of healthcare services.
- Public health authorities should explicitly define standard
range of services based on local burden of diseases, and
availability of costeffective of interventions to be delivered
by the public health care institutions. Governments should
review the job descriptions, cadre strength, recruitment
systems and posting policy to improve consistent availability
of predefined services through all public HCIs. This, we
believe, will help in better targeting of public subsidies to
the poor.
- In the near and medium term, the public sector hospitals
will have to respond to the hospitalisation needs of the poor.
This would mean upgrading and expansion of first referral
hospital facilities in the public sector. The First Referral
Health Systems project in Andhra Pradesh and few other states
have program components to upgrade and expand the first
referral hospitals in the public sector. More work is needed
to estimate requirement of hospital stock in view of current
and future levels of disease burden and hospital service
requirements.
- Encourage development of nonprofit health care facilities in
the long run. Actually this later objective is best pursued
through social movements. It will be difficult to achieve
sustainable growth of nonprofit health care institutions
through government policy. Limited role of government policy
towards nonprofit HCIs will be to provide a signal about the
desirability of voluntary action. The range of nonprofit HCI
promotion policies would include (a) legislative mandate for
incorporation of nonprofit HCIs for different purposes related
to healthcare, (b) legislative recognition of the special
needs of health insurance organisations, (c) land and capital
grants to nonprofit HCIs, etc.
- Government programmes encouraging nonprofit HCIs will
inevitably attract opportunistic nonprofit institution
building in addition to spontaneous voluntary action. Hence
the nonprofit HCI promotion policy should be accompanied by
development of appropriate regulatory mechanisms for the
nonprofit sector. These would include model code of
transparency in governance of civil society institutions, and
standards of accounting practices for nonprofit institutions.
Clearly some of these policy measures require action outside
the health sector. For example standards of accounting
practices can be prescribed under the income tax rules that
provide for registration of nonprofit institutions.
- Substantially increase allocations for healthcare services
by;
|
|
|
|
- Streamlining, and expansion of fiduciary social
security services, and
- Substantial increases in allocation of government
expenditure to health sector.
|
|
|
|
- Establish rate setting policies and authorities to set fair
rates of healthcare service charges. These rates will
facilitate purchase of healthcare services by the government
from private forprofit and nonprofit providers. It will well
recognised that health care institutions both forprofit and
nonprofit have a motivation to maximise revenue by exploiting
the rate structure and payment systems. Hence, the rate
setting mechanism should provide for research programmes to
monitor impact of rate setting decisions and take appropriate
remedial action from time to time.
- Streamline existing state licensing mechanisms for
healthcare professionals.
- Create state licensing mechanisms for healthcare facilities
of all kinds including group practices, nursing homes,
hospitals, diagnostic facilities etc. Develop national network
of institutions to contribute towards development of standards
and specifications for different aspects of the healthcare
facility licensing process. The standards development should
be done by an organisation with adequate research and
documentation on the subject. Standards should be developed by
professional and research teams following wide ranging
consultation among various stake holders. The minimum
standards should be specified on the basis of size and service
offering. In other words both bed size and service offering of
the hospital should be taken into consideration to arrive at
the minimum required facilities. Marginal modification to
standards may be allowed on the basis of location features
like urban, rural and remote areas. Substantial deviation on
the basis of rural urban character of the hospital should not
be allowed. Instead appropriate restriction in range of
service may be made.
- Encourage voluntary accreditation in addition to the state
licensing mechanism.
- Government may facilitate availability of incentives to
encourage accreditation: For example social insurance schemes
run by government could require accreditation as a
prerequisite for empanelment. Require information on
accreditation status and factor it into the decision making
process while considering requests for any direct or indirect
state subsidy like tax concessions etc. Where the subsidy
precedes setting up and / or operation of a hospital or
service, a condition may be imposed by the concerned
government requiring that the beneficiary institution will
obtain and maintain accreditation within a certain period of
time.
- Establish a program for development, periodic updating and
dissemination of clinical practice guidelines (CPG).
- Establish a program of research on measurement of medical
outcomes which will help in the long run, use of risk rated
medical outcome data for comparison of technical quality of
care by health care institutions.
- Essential clinical package definition: Immediate priority is
to explicitly allocate existing cadre strength of entry level
medical officers in first referral hospitals among the five
commonly required specialties namely, (a) General Medicine,
Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Paediatrics, General Surgery and
Orthopaedics. between the Define essential clinical package of
services to be delivered at the first referral hospitals.
Medium term priority is to explicitly define the essential
clinical package of services. Reorganise staffing in public
HCIs commensurate with the essential clinical package.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|